Fires

Without trying to form a real deep connection between the wildfires going on today, (now) and my post I made yesterday, let’s just assume that they DID cause the fires. My point is that, if we can cause say a fire, then we might be able to put out a fire, but those are two different things, and while I don’t see a connection between causing a fire accidentally and putting out a fire, at least not in the sense that i’m speaking of, we’re going to try anyways.

What could we possibly do, if writing some bullshit about people having incorrect thoughts and actions could cause a fire, what might put out a fire, or even better, put out the negative?

I am speaking of the negative that I always speak of, but this time making an attempt to put it out in the same form we used to start the fire. So we must write about the negative, or perhaps everything that we know, to try to cause it to be put out. I do not have the mind to write about bunnies and stuff for a whole book, so i’ve set it to be about a negative. The book will be in electronic format, so I can post it here when I am finished with it, but that’s a long ways away. Trying to stop negative energy will likely take everything we’ve got, and we’ll likely still come up short.

I am thinking of a writing in the range of over 1,500 pages. I think that this will stop the negative, and if we’re lucky we’ll receive the benefits of the book as im writing it. I could even post parts of it to this website, everybody could see it, and thus take actions based on what I may find, it’s not really that advanced of a concept,

But I think to actually succeed here will actually take the whole 1,500 page mark. It will take it all because everytime we try to stop the negative, it always comes up short, or we find that it didn’t work at all, or something like that. So I am really set on writing it.

I haven’t decided upon much else than that. I remember one time my sister’s boyfriend said to me “we need that book” and he was talking about something, it was irrelevant to me, I didn’t know what he was talking about… and now I know, we must stop the negative, except, the negative is a non living thing, so it can try to stop us unabated, and we cannot do anything about it, it’s like a terrorist.

But was he actually talking about this negative book? What other book could they so desperately need that they go out of character to burn into my mind a memory of him asking for it? It would have to be something like this.

Specifically, he was talking about a book I was reading from in my classroom, except I never told my sisters boyfriend/husband about reading from a book in my classroom. Somebody would have had to have been in the classroom, then traveled with me to my sister’s house, and then asked for the book. That or they could just read my mind with a cellphone like device, or something along those lines. I think what he was really speaking of is a book to destroy the negative.

Then you’ll perhaps write books, and it will be an avalanche, or something. Perhaps the AI’s could just print books out by the… the whole thing… it seems too much, it doesn’t seem possible to stick with something for that long of a time, it just isn’t going to happen.

I’ve started books in the past, and never wrote into them beyond a few days, but i’ve never targeted negative energy, or had any target, while doing so. I do feel strongly about removing the negative, it’s what I spend doing all of the time, or at least thinking about doing it.

So i’m calling it the “Bipartisan Infrastructure” Book. Because it’s bipartisan, and it’s about what controls us, the book starts out talking about how the infrastructure of our reality is under attack — by us.

…And that infrastructure will have to be created, to facilitate something positive happening, it’s not going to happen if we all just do nothing. So that’s what it’s about, doing stuff, I know you say it comes easy to me, that it’s my nature, and that I should do it, but if we all tried, if we all did stuff to try to stop the negative, perhaps it would stop, of course, building new infrastructure will cause it to perhaps flee, but it will be fleeing on ground we have control over. To actually stop it, I am guessing that say, a fight will break out, in some form, over the fleeing of it.

What got us to where we are today, what’s the last thing that happened? COVID-19. That was the last thing that occurred, and we never fully stopped it, not even after like 4 years. It gained ground, it held that ground, and now it lives on that ground. It’s similar to what i’m talking about, building infrastructure, new stuff, on what we do have, and what we don’t have as well.

Plain and simple, when this is all over, it won’t be enough. We know what we’re throwing at it next is not going to be enough, should we reconsider what we’re doing, or are we gaining some valuable ground against the threat? The threat being negative energy, that negative things happen and positive things happen, and that to have something positive happen you must have a negative attached to it. Against that, what we’re doing wont be enough but, we don’t really have anything better to throw at it, so we have to hope to wound it at the very least, and that’s about all that we can hope for. Were it to be wounded or something some larger God could come by and finish it off, or at least rend it’s leg, then with the wound and the weakened leg, suppose the people come after it, attacking it from all sides, it’s weakened, we have to retreat at times, yes, but we have to attack it to kill it.

That is something that nobody does, retreat, they never retreat. They always just think that whats the point of retreating when we’re in a war? What’s the point of going backwards? You’ve come up to the threat, launched an attack, and now, out of breath, you retreat to catch your breath instead of giving the thing it’s own chance to attack you back. It’s very simple sounding but very hard in practice.

Who can be focusing on attacking something and then focus on moving BACKWARDS? I sound like some critic of the idea. But, we will have to retreat at times, for in the end our last action will be to retreat — we will have dealt our blows, it won’t be enough, and we will then have to retreat.