These are soldiers dieing, so shouldn’t we say to ourselves that these are our units dieing, and we shouldn’t be throwing them at each other like this?
The other side of the coin is this: We cannot be sure that it’s not necessary, and we know that we win if we do this, so let’s just do it and be done with it, that is the other side of the coin, and both seem equally convincing to me.
I simply cannot figure it out, if you want a reading, you’ve killed slightly ahead of yourselves, that is not to say that it’s not a necessary endeavor that your embarking on, but that it IS necessary!
Let’s say as of today you have shed 130% blood when we needed to shed 100% by today, that is my take on it.
But then again, being this close to the same person that has beleaguered the negative within his home town, and yet there is another side to that as well, i’m sure you can guess what it is — the bloodshed is enabling that person to do that, and making it easier for him, so which is it?
We want to stop the war in ukraine, but we can’t, because it’s so necessary, it’s just such a huge reading that I get from it, sure they are dieing but they are certainly not passing in vain…